Skip to content

Strategies for Change, Innovation & Transformation

Research Article

Typology of Industrial Collaborative Ideals: How Industry Approaches University–Industry Collaboration (UIC)

Peter Egorov1, Natascha Eckert

  1. 1The University of Adelaide

International Journal of Psychology and Strategic Communication, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 432–457, 2025

Published 16 July 2025

https://doi.org/10.61030/NKCS9124

review
double-blind
access
open
license
CC-BY-4.0
year
2025
doi
registered

Article PDF

Abstract

University–Industry Collaboration (UIC) has been a well-established field of research for over 50 years, offering valuable insights into best practices, precursors, and supporting factors. Importantly, it recognizes industry partners as proactive contributors. However, a comprehensive understanding of how the industry itself approaches UIC remains limited. To address this gap, the present study investigates collaboration strategies used by industry when engaging with higher education institutions (HEIs). It defines ideal types of industrial collaborators and illustrates their distinctive engagement approaches. In doing so, it sheds light on how enterprises structure their partnerships with academia. Methodologically, the study adopts a qualitative, inductive approach. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with senior managers and strategic decision-makers from large enterprises actively engaged in academic collaboration. For analytical rigor, we followed the method outlined by Gioia et al. (2013). Subsequently, we developed a typology using the framework proposed by Doty and Glick (1994). As a result, the analysis introduces a novel typology of industrial collaboration ideals. This framework enhances our understanding of the complex and multidimensional nature of UIC from the industry’s perspective. Moreover, it allows for a more nuanced exploration of the different ways companies approach university partnerships. In particular, we identify key variations in organizational strategy, collaboration infrastructure, and support mechanisms that enable effective engagement with academic institutions. These differences highlight divergent approaches in how collaborations are designed, implemented, and sustained. Ultimately, this study provides critical insights into the often-overlooked industry viewpoint within the Triple Helix framework. Therefore, it offers a benchmark for assessing the effectiveness of collaborative practices and lays the groundwork for refining and optimizing future UIC strategies.

Keywords: University–Industry Collaboration, Typology, Strategic engagement, Knowledge transfer, Co-creation, Industry strategy, Academic partnerships

Double-blind peer reviewOpen AccessCC BY 4.0Published 2025DOI registered
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Title

Typology of Industrial Collaborative Ideals: How Industry Approaches University–Industry Collaboration (UIC)

Volume 1Issue 3

Authors and Affiliations

Author

Peter Egorov

The University of Adelaide

Author

Natascha Eckert

Journal / Publisher Details

International Journal of Psychology and Strategic Communication
Volume 01
Issue 03
Year 2025
Pages 432-457

Abstract

University–Industry Collaboration (UIC) has been a well-established field of research for over 50 years, offering valuable insights into best practices, precursors, and supporting factors. Importantly, it recognizes industry partners as proactive contributors. However, a comprehensive understanding of how the industry itself approaches UIC remains limited. To address this gap, the present study investigates collaboration strategies used by industry when engaging with higher education institutions (HEIs). It defines ideal types of industrial collaborators and illustrates their distinctive engagement approaches. In doing so, it sheds light on how enterprises structure their partnerships with academia. Methodologically, the study adopts a qualitative, inductive approach. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with senior managers and strategic decision-makers from large enterprises actively engaged in academic collaboration. For analytical rigor, we followed the method outlined by Gioia et al. (2013). Subsequently, we developed a typology using the framework proposed by Doty and Glick (1994). As a result, the analysis introduces a novel typology of industrial collaboration ideals. This framework enhances our understanding of the complex and multidimensional nature of UIC from the industry’s perspective. Moreover, it allows for a more nuanced exploration of the different ways companies approach university partnerships. In particular, we identify key variations in organizational strategy, collaboration infrastructure, and support mechanisms that enable effective engagement with academic institutions. These differences highlight divergent approaches in how collaborations are designed, implemented, and sustained. Ultimately, this study provides critical insights into the often-overlooked industry viewpoint within the Triple Helix framework. Therefore, it offers a benchmark for assessing the effectiveness of collaborative practices and lays the groundwork for refining and optimizing future UIC strategies.

Keywords

University–Industry Collaboration, Typology, Strategic engagement, Knowledge transfer, Co-creation, Industry strategy, Academic partnerships

Full Article (PDF)

Download PDF


IJPSC Citation Tools

Cite this article

10.61030/NKCS9124

Dr. Peter Egorov, PhD in Economics, Faculty of the Professions, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, e-mail: peter.egorov@outlook.com, & Dr. Natascha Eckert (2025). Typology of Industrial Collaborative Ideals: How Industry Approaches University–Industry Collaboration (UIC). International Journal of Psychology and Strategic Communication, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.61030/NKCS9124

Download BibTeX Download RIS