Skip to content

Strategies for Change, Innovation & Transformation

Next Round Table INU-DNU Round Table: Systemic Change, Risk, Resilience and Strategic Communication Wednesday, 4 November 2026, 14:00 Cologne

in --d --h --m --s now live

Register Program

Article

Partnering with Academia

Peter Egorov1

  1. 1The University of Adelaide

International Journal of Psychology and Strategic Communication, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 474–493, 2025

https://doi.org/10.61030/MTCR3782

review
double-blind
access
open
license
CC-BY-4.0
year
2025
doi
registered

Article PDF

PARTNERING WITH ACADEMIA: INDIRECT INDICATORS OF SUCCESS

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
DOUBLE-BLIND PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE
This article has been evaluated and accepted through a formal double-blind peer-review process.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Title
PARTNERING WITH ACADEMIA: INDIRECT INDICATORS OF SUCCESS

Author
Dr. Peter Egorov
Faculty of the Professions, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

Journal / Publisher Details
Journal: International Journal of Psychology and Strategic Communication
Volume: 01, Issue 03 (2025)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61030/MTCR3782

Abstract
Industry stakeholders invest heavily in academic collaborations, making it essential to define success measures. Evaluating UIC helps focus efforts and allocate resources effectively, yet assessing knowledge value and partnership status is challenging due to their dynamic nature. These complexities hinder the establishment of rigid success criteria. To address this, we conducted semi-structured interviews with executives from global conglomerates across 13 industries. This diverse sample allowed us to examine direct and indirect metrics used by multinational companies to assess academic partnerships. We analyzed best practices and assessment frequencies, developing a comprehensive scheme of proxy indicators. This framework incorporates qualitative and quantitative measures, capturing both success factors and failure indicators. Our findings fill a gap in industry perspectives on UIC, offering an extensive, inductively derived scheme of proxy indicators. These reflect industry considerations regarding success, failure, and partnership evaluations. By expanding theoretical evidence and refining proxy measures, our research provides new insights into academic collaboration assessment.

Keywords
UIC, industry perspective, industry collaboration evaluation, evaluation scheme, success factors, failure indicators

How to Cite This Article
Egorov, P. (2025). PARTNERING WITH ACADEMIA: INDIRECT INDICATORS OF SUCCESS. International Journal of Psychology and Strategic Communication. https://doi.org/10.61030/MTCR3782

Full Article (PDF)
https://ijpsc.org/journal/v03/Partnering-with-Academia.pdf

Metadata and Info

IJPSC Citation Tools

Cite this article

10.61030/MTCR3782

International Journal of Psychology and Strategic Communication (2025). Partnering with Academia. International Journal of Psychology and Strategic Communication, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.61030/MTCR3782